Second quarter Gross Domestic Product (GDP) came out on July 28th declining 0.9%, the second straight quarterly decline.
This is where the fun begins. The “Are we in a recession or not?” talk turned business TV into a sports debate show. There is no shortage of opinions on the topic.
The old saying “different strokes for different folks” comes to mind.
If you believe we’re in a recession, there’s plenty of data to prove your point. If you don’t believe it’s a recession, again, there’s plenty of data to prove your point.
The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) – usually the arbiter of what is or isn’t a recession – acknowledges most recessions are defined by two consecutive quarters of declining real GDP… but not always.
It’s a rule of thumb. Take 2001 for example. Here was GDP by quarter:
• Q1: (-1.3%)
• Q2: +2.5%
• Q3: (-1.6%)
• Q4: +1.1%
We did not have two consecutive quarters of negative GDP, but NBER said a recession took place from March 2001 through November 2001. Did we have a recession? The answer is “it depends,” which, of course, is not a satisfying answer.
2001 was a shallow recession that primarily impacted the technology sector. Unemployment went from 4% to 6% but that was still well below the 10.1% unemployment during the 2009 recession. Home values nationally appreciated without interruption during the late ’90s and early 2000s. There were some pockets of the country where home prices fell (northern California, Seattle) but most of the country did not even notice.
Looking at counter-evidence to recession invites the “you’re moving the goalpost!” crowd. It’s certainly possible we are in a recession and things could always get worse.
But we’re not trying to convince anyone we are or are not in a recession. If you’re one of the employees who was laid off at Shopify or Ford last week, it’s a recession and you’re not open to any counterclaims. But if you work in the oil and gas industry, things have never been better.
All of this to say things are very confusing. Fed chair Jerome Powell mentioned, “These are not normal times.” Hard to disagree.
If you’re looking at the “Recession v. Not Recession” box score, on the “recession” side of the ledger you have:
- Two consecutive quarters of negative GDP
- Highest levels of inflation in 40+ years
- Lowest consumer sentiment ever, according to survey data going back to the ’50s
On the “not a recession” side of the ledger you have:
- A strong labor market, with 2.1 million jobs added in the first half of the year and a 3.6% unemployment rate
- Earnings reports from the world’s biggest financial companies have all shown similar findings, i.e., the consumer is fine with no signs of a spending slowdown.
- On July 28th, the Las Vegas strip reported June gambling revenue up 23% vs. last year. Data points don’t exist in isolation, but if you just had that single piece of data, how could we possibly be in a recession?
- LVMH (parent company of Louis Vuitton, Tiffany & Co, Fendi) put up record numbers in the first six months of the year
In short, you can build whatever narrative you want. Things are bad in some areas and amazing in others. If it is a recession, for the time being, it appears to be a shallow one.
Additionally, the S&P 500 rallied after the GDP number came out, finishing up 1.0%. The day prior, the Fed raised interest rates 75 basis points and the S&P rallied 1.7%. Nobody is calling “the” bottom, but the market rallying on bad news could be “a” bottoming of sorts.
Who knows what to make of all this – there are no easy answers.
Charlie Munger said it best: “If you’re not confused, you don’t understand it.”
This is intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as personalized investment or financial advice. Please consult your investment and financial professional(s) regarding your unique situation.